The Supreme Court volition presently catch whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sexual practice discrimination inwards employment, covers discrimination on the footing of sexual orientation together with gender identity. The lower courts are carve upwardly on whether such protection is granted past times the evidently linguistic communication of the statute. The example volition endure argued Oct 8.
July three was the deadline for filing amicus briefs, together with Yale Law Prof. William Eskridge together with I coauthored one, disputation that a textualist approach to interpretation, which has been endorsed past times all the conservative justices, entails that LGBT discrimination is sexual practice discrimination. The Court cannot deny the sexual practice discrimination claim without betraying its commitment to textualism. The brief is here.
If anything inwards it persuades you, that business office was in all probability written past times Bill Eskridge.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar